Untitled document

Awesome Thoughts On Why Claims Of Accident Compensation Culture Are Just Overblown

A whole lot has been claimed in the news and also on TV recently regarding the so-called “compensation culture” in the UK. The government appears to be choosing a particular posture and mostly supporting powerful insurance groups, to try and change the way in which the system shields claimants and helps to ensure that they get what they’re deservingly eligible for. At the centre of this position to try and restrict payouts and access to certain legal services is the wish to try to get rid of fraud, which in part goes towards the skyrocketing costs of insurance premiums. Nevertheless, agents of organisations such as the Access to Justice Action Group are convinced that fraudulent claims are typically limited to only about twelve in every 10,000 applications and that the extensive changes suggested drastically impact the majority of innocent, but struggling people.

While the compensation culture might well be typical in some other countries all over the world, it’s tough to label the United Kingdom as having such a culture. This runs specifically true if you realise that only about one in four people associated with a road traffic accident bothers to record and claim and only one in two actually bothers to claim work accident compensation, despite the fact that they understand that someone else ended up being to blame.

Should we look at this as being merely a “grin and bear it” kind of approach? Or should we look at it as being indication that we already have significant obstacles before anyone needing to pursue accident compensation, at least with regards to perception. Many people simply don’t realise that they might be able to use the no win no fee claim situation when looking for accident compensation and often do not come forward despite the fact that they possess a strong case.

It appears to be in everyone’s interest to ensure that the facts are shown anytime any changes that might affect a person’s ability to claim compensation are suggested. Widespread alterations shouldn’t be made without full independent inquiries, because there are far-reaching consequences, to say the least.

Leave a Comment

*

Previous post:

Next post: